|
Your Majesties, Your Royal Highnesses, Distinguished Members of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, citizens of America, and citizens of the world:
I receive this honor with deep gratitude and great humility. It is an award that speaks to our highest aspirations - that for all the cruelty and hardship of our
world, we are not mere prisoners of fate. Our actions matter, and can bend history in the direction of justice.
One urgent example is the effort to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons, and to seek a world without them. In the middle of the last century, nations
agreed to be bound by a treaty whose bargain is clear: all will have access to peaceful nuclear power; those without nuclear weapons will forsake them; and
those with nuclear weapons will work toward disarmament. I am committed to upholding this treaty. It is a centerpiece of my foreign policy. And I
am working with President Medvedev to reduce America and Russia's nuclear stockpiles.
But it is also incumbent upon all of us
to insist that nations like Iran and
North Korea do not game the system.
Those who claim to respect international
law cannot avert their eyes when those
laws are flouted. Those who care for
their own security cannot ignore the
danger of an arms race in the Middle
East or East Asia. Those who seek peace
cannot stand idly by as nations arm
themselves for nuclear war.
The same principle applies to those who
violate international law by brutalizing
their own people. When there is genocide
in Darfur; systematic rape in Congo; or
repression in Burma - there must be
consequences. And the closer we stand
together, the less likely we will be
faced with the choice between armed
intervention and complicity in
oppression.
This brings me to a second point - the
nature of the peace that we seek. For
peace is not merely the absence of
visible conflict. Only a just peace
based upon the inherent rights and
dignity of every individual can truly be
lasting.
It was this insight that drove drafters
of the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights after the Second World War. In
the wake of devastation, they recognized
that if human rights are not protected,
peace is a hollow promise.

And yet all too often, these words are
ignored. In some countries, the failure
to uphold human rights is excused by the
false suggestion that these are Western
principles, foreign to local cultures or
stages of a nation's development. And
within America, there has long been a
tension between those who describe
themselves as realists or idealists - a
tension that suggests a stark choice
between the narrow pursuit of interests
or an endless campaign to impose our
values.
I reject this choice. I believe that
peace is unstable where citizens are
denied the right to speak freely or
worship as they please; choose their own
leaders or assemble without fear. Pent
up grievances fester, and the
suppression of tribal and religious
identity can lead to violence. We also
know that the opposite is true. Only
when Europe became free did it finally
find peace. America has never fought a
war against a democracy, and our closest
friends are governments that protect the
rights of their citizens. No matter how
callously defined, neither America's
interests - nor the world's -are served
by the denial of human aspirations.
| Excerpts from the Speech of UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon on event for Human Rights Day, 10 December 2011
|
|
Human rights belong to every one of us without exception. But unless we know them, unless we demand they be respected, and unless we defend our right -- and the right of others -- to exercise them, they will be just words in a decades-old document.
That is why, on Human Rights Day, we do more than celebrate the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948 – we acknowledge its enduring relevance for our own times.
The importance of human rights has been underlined over and over again this year. Across the globe, people mobilized to demand justice, dignity, equality, participation -- the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration.
Many of these peaceful demonstrators persevered despite being met with violence and further repression. In some countries, the struggle continues; in others, important concessions were gained or dictators were toppled as the will of the people prevailed.
Many of the people seeking their legitimate aspirations were linked through social media. Gone are the days when repressive governments could totally control the flow of information. Today, within their existing obligation to respect the rights of freedom of assembly and expression, governments must not block access to the internet and various forms of social media as a way to prevent criticism and public debate.
Yet at the end of an extraordinary year for human rights, let us take strength from the achievements of 2011: new democratic transitions set in motion, new steps to ensure accountability for war crimes and crimes against humanity, new and ever-spreading awareness of rights themselves.
As we look to the challenges ahead, let us take inspiration from the example of human rights activists and the timeless power of the Universal Declaration, and do our utmost to uphold the ideals and aspirations that speak for every culture and every person.
|
|
Excerpts from the Speech of United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay on the event of Human Rights Day 10 December 2011 |
|
2011 has been an extraordinary year for human rights.
A year when a single word, embodying the thwarted quest of a single impoverished young man in a remote province of Tunisia, struck a chord which swiftly rose to a crescendo.
Within days it had rolled into the capital, Tunis, with such a roar that, in just four weeks it knocked the foundations from under an entrenched and apparently invincible authoritarian regime. This precedent, and its radical revision of the art of the possible, quickly reverberated into the streets and squares of Cairo, followed one after another by towns and cities all across the region, and, ultimately, in different forms, across the world.
That word, that quest, was for “dignity.”
In Tunis and Cairo, Benghazi and Dara’a, and later on – albeit in a very different context – in Madrid, New York, London, Santiago and elsewhere, millions of people from all walks of life have mobilized to make their own demands for human dignity. They have dusted off the promise of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and demanded “freedom from fear and freedom from want,” the Declaration’s shorthand for all the civil, political, social economic and cultural rights it contains. They have reminded governments and international institutions alike that health care, and education and housing, and access to justice, are not commodities for sale to the few, but rather rights, guaranteed to everyone, everywhere, without discrimination.
In 2011, the very idea of “power” shifted. During the course of this extraordinary year, it was wielded not just by mighty institutions in marble buildings, but increasingly by ordinary men, women, and even children, courageously standing up to demand their rights. In the Middle East and North Africa, many thousands have paid with their lives, and tens of thousands have been injured, besieged, tortured, detained, and threatened, but their newfound determination to demand their rights has meant they are no longer willing to accept injustice.
Although we must mourn the lives of many, including -- just in recent days – during the remorseless assault on various towns and cities in Syria, in renewed excessive use of force in Cairo and in efforts to subvert the elections taking place in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, we also have cause to celebrate.
The message of this unexpected global awakening was carried in the first instance not by the satellites of major media conglomerates, or conferences, or other traditional means – although these all played a role -- but by the dynamic and irrepressible surge of social media.
The results have been startling.
By the end of this first year of the global awakening, we have already seen peaceful and successful elections in Tunisia and, earlier this week, in Egypt -- where the turn-out for the first truly democratic elections there for decades has exceeded everybody’s expectations, despite the shocking upsurge in violence in Tahrir Square.
Today, as in the past, editorial and financial factors – as well as access – determine whether or not protests, and repression of protests, are televised or reported in newspapers around the world. But, wherever it happens, you can now guarantee it will be tweeted on Twitter, posted on Facebook, broadcast on Youtube, and uploaded onto the internet. Governments no longer hold the ability to monopolize the dissemination of information and censor what it says.
Instead we are seeing real lives in real struggle, broadcast in real time – and it is in many ways an exhilarating sight.
In sum, in 2011, human rights went viral.
On Human Rights Day 2011, I urge everyone, everywhere to join in the internet and social media campaign my office has launched to help more people know, demand and defend their human rights. It is a campaign that should be maintained so long as human rights abuses continue.
|
|
Excerpts from the Speech by H.E. President of India, Smt. Pratibha Devisingh Patil on the occasion of the Human Rights Day Function at New Delhi on 10 December 2007. |
|
I am indeed happy to participate in the Human Rights Day function commemorating the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights by the United Nations in 1948. Every year, more and more people, the world over are gathering to demonstrate their support for the fundamental principles of human rights particularly in democratic states. Human rights and democracy are closely intertwined. The defence of democracy itself means the defence of individual and collective human rights. In democratic societies, fundamental human rights and freedoms are put under the guarantee of law and therefore, their protection becomes an obligation for those who are entrusted with the task of their protection.
Human rights have a direct relationship with human development and therefore, the universality of human rights demands an equitable global order. To achieve this end, the importance of “Right to Development” cannot be over emphasized as a basic human right for all people across the globe.
Human dignity is the backbone of human rights. The Constitution of India proclaims “the dignity of the individual” as a core value in its Preamble. Therefore, it is important that the development process in the country is equitable and that there is a wider spread of the fruits of development. Opportunities for growth for all sections of society in particular for the disadvantaged and vulnerable are important.
Poverty is the biggest violator of human rights. Poverty deprives the poor of human rights and basic entitlements like nutrition, shelter, education, health, safe drinking water and other elements of dignified living. Persistence of poverty renders realization of human rights rather illusory. Our foremost endeavour should be to eradicate poverty so as to enhance the access of the poor and the deprived sections to the basic amenities of life and impart to them skills that equip them to find a decent livelihood.
A sustained effort to empower women is essential to deliver on our commitment to ensure equality with respect to political, economic and social rights. Protection of their human rights calls for improved law enforcement and enforcing accountability for those who commit violence and atrocities against women. Rights of women must be protected if a society is to be stable and progressive.
There is a need to disseminate knowledge and awareness about human rights provisions among all stakeholders. It is the people, who know their rights who stand the best chance of realizing them. The media and NGOs can be effective vehicles for spreading awareness about fundamental rights. NGOs should educate people about the rights guaranteed to them.
On this day let us rededicate ourselves to sensitize people about human rights issues and to strive towards promoting a culture rooted in the values of peace, development, tolerance, harmony and universal brotherhood. Let us build a society fully committed to human rights. If human rights institutions, civil society, government, media groups, parliamentarians, the judiciary and opinion makers work in unison and with dedication, the task of ensuring enjoyment of human rights by all will translate into a reality.
|
|
Excerpts from the Speech Delivered by Hon'ble Prime Minister of India, Dr. Manmohan Singh at the International Conference of Jurists on Terrorism, Rule of Law and Human Rights on December 13, 2008, New Delhi. |
|
The rule of law and regard for due process and respect for fundamental Human Rights are the very foundation of any modern civilized society. These are enshrined in our magnificent constitution. But all these values are today threatened by the forces of terrorism. It is in this context that the subject of your conference is both timely and relevant to our times. There is an integral link between our defence of human rights, our defence of the rule of law and our fight against the forces of terrorism, extremism and intolerance.
I have often said that terrorism anywhere is a threat to peace and freedom everywhere. This is an inevitable consequence of the increasing integration of global economy, polity and society. The forces of terrorism, inspired by ideologies of hatred, intolerance and exclusion, pose today a fundamental challenge to liberal democracies, pursuit of secular ideals, pluralism and all that we associate with freedom, the rule of law and human rights. They pose a challenge to democracy at home, to democracy in our region, to democracy around the world.
I believe therefore all peace-loving, democratic forces around the world have to join hands in the fight against all manifestations of extremism and intolerance. The threat of terrorism in this increasingly integrated world that we live in is not divisible. The fight against it is also not divisible. The defence of freedom and peace is also not divisible.
I would like to take this opportunity to thank the international community for expressing its solidarity with the people of India in the wake of the horrible terrorist attacks at Mumbai. I have received phone calls and letters from numerous Heads of State and Government from all over the world and from our neighbourhood, assuring us that they stand with us in our fight against terrorism.
In our region, there is today growing awareness that terrorism and extremism pose a threat to democracy and development. Governments and authorities in our region and elsewhere have therefore a moral duty to act firmly and quickly. Our people expect us to stay united, stand united and act unitedly in the face of these grave challenges that we face.
The greatest contribution of our freedom struggle and our national movement is the democratic inheritance we have got. Our freedom struggle was forged on the anvil of pluralism. Unity in diversity, was our defining motto. The Rule of Law and the Constitutional guarantee of fundamental human rights were the greatest gift we secured for ourselves as a free people.
It is these fundamental and defining features of our nationhood that are today challenged by the forces of extremism, irrespective of the ideology that inspires them. The time has come for all of us to unite and speak as one in defence of our democratic inheritance. The people of India have shown tremendous unity and courage in this critical hour. It is heartening that major political parties have also risen above their narrower interests to speak and work in a spirit of cooperation.
|
|
Excerpts from the Inaugural Address of Mr. Justice J S Verma, the then Chairperson, National Human Rights Commssion on the occasion of the inauguration of the Indian Institute of Human Rights on 10 December 1999 (Human Rights Day) at New Delhi. |
|
Today is the Human Rights Day and I am glad to note that the Indian Institute of Human Rights is being established on this auspicious occasion.
All members of the human family must be treated as equal - equality being a human right.
Human Rights are all those characteristics or attributes that are essential to life with dignity. The violation of human rights occurs when any act, or omission to act, results in a conseqence that is inconsistent with the dignity of the individual.
Human Rights are natural rights which are non negotiable and do not depend on conferment by any authority. They are inherent in human existence. Enacting law is not enough unless there is a change in the thinking process of society as a whole. The remedy lies in education within the family, from the earliest stage of life and throughout society.
The acknowledged index of civilisation for each country is its track record of respect for human rights in the country. There is an urgent need to rededicate to the upliftment of the common man and for developing a human rights culture in every sphere of life and in the instruments of governance.
The main objective of the Institute should be to make the Protection of Human Rights Act as effective as possible by reading into it the intent behind the legislation and interpreting that to its fullest extent. The National Human Rights Commission is a complement to the institutions of the judiciary.
The increase in the number of comlaints received by NHRC is indicative of the increasing violations of human rights in society. The greatest need is to increase awareness about human rights because every aware individual ceases to be a potential violator and instead becomes a potential protector.
I have great pleasure in extending my best wishes for the success of the programmes of the Indian Institute of Human Rights, New Delhi. |
|